By James Joyce
Published 2013 by Vintage (first published February 2nd 1922), 816pp
The Short of It:
A fantastical romp of failures and missed opportunities but a real treat for the imagination.
The Rest of It:
Oh! How people dread this one! Long ago I tried to read it but never got past the beginning. Mostly it was a timing issue. I made a mental note to come back to it and so I did, with a few others who joined me for a read-along.
Let me tell you, the first half vexed me. It was gibberish. No matter how many times I read a sentence, it made no sense! I even resorted to reading it out loud. My dog thought I was yelling at her though so I had to stop. But somewhere in the second half, Joyce’s writing became understandable and from there, there was no turning back.
The story takes place on June 16. A day so celebrated by fans that it’s called Bloomsday. Leopold Bloom’s day is spent having lunch, spending time with friends, visiting brothels and bailing his friends out of trouble. The chapters (episodes) vary in format and the narration shifts back and forth between characters.
Much of it makes no sense. You just have to know that going in. There are plenty of reading guides available but most of them just tell you to read it for yourself. It’s a book that begs you to hate it but if you appreciate a good imagination and don’t mind dealing with hallucinations and fantastical elements, then perhaps you’ll love it.
Do I love it? Maybe. It’s been a few days since I finished it and my thoughts are still percolating. I can see myself re-reading it at some point.
Did I mention that it was banned for pornographic content? The ban was lifted in 1934 when it was noted as an emetic, but certainly not an aphrodisiac. Can you believe that? An emetic?? I will admit, it’s a bit smutty. If you are sensitive to lascivious talk then this probably isn’t a book for you.
Did you know that Ulysses is the Latinised name of Odysseus, the hero of Homer’s epic poem Odyssey, and the novel establishes a series of parallels between the poem and the novel? (Wikipedia) I went into this book not knowing this piece of information but somewhere in the beginning I figured this out.
Did you know that it was originally published as a serial publication in the magazine The Little Review? My copy of the book did not include the episode titles so every time I saw a particular episode mentioned somewhere, I had a really hard time finding it in my copy. I was aware of the serial publication but I wish I had purchased a book that contained those titles. My copy only separated Parts I, II and III. There were no breaks between episodes so I could not tell when a new one had started.
Even with all the obstacles noted, this is a book that will stay with me for a long, long time. While reading it at work I was surprised at how many people showed an interest in it. My copy has already been loaned out to a colleague. I can’t wait to hear her thoughts.
Here are the read-along breakdowns in case you’re interested:
This article from The Economist is rather interesting and might encourage you to give it a go.
What other BEAST might I want to tackle? Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace.
Disclosure: This post contains Indiebound affiliate links.
10 thoughts on “Review: Ulysses”
In case you didn’t get enough, Telegraph Avenue by Michael Chabon is in part a retelling of Ulysses.
Which could be the reason why I was unable to read Telegraph Avenue.
I admire you for reading this – I don’t think I have it in me.
Wow…an amazing feat! Like Kathy…I could not manage this!
Ulysses is one of my next two reads, and I now know why I have been putting it off.
Nice review Ti. It sounds like much gibberish, which I think would stop me dead cold in my reading tracks. I admire you for getting through it.
Much of it was almost impossible to understand but if you skimmed it, you’d miss little pieces of decipherable text so I tried really hard not to skim. It really made me work!
Congratulations again on finishing it! I find your reaction intriguing, especially the fact that you would consider a re-read. I have often wondered what it is about this impossible-to-love text that makes people fall in love with it, especially when no one can really say why they do. Yet, here you are wanting to re-read it one day, and even you can’t say why you want to do that. It’s like a secret Ulysses club! 😉
Haha. I suppose you’re right. I feel as if the first half was put in to weed out the true readers! LOL. That’s why I want to read it again. I am no longer shocked by it or frustrated by it. It’s like a puzzle.
I ultimately have given up on this book. I couldn’t get any further. DNF for the list