Tag Archives: Book Review

Run, by Ann Patchett

I received my copy of Run, by Ann Patchett as part of Gayle’s online book club over at Everyday I Write The Book. Thank you Gayle! If you’d like to read some of the comments from the group, click here.

Now, on with the review. Here is the blurb from Barnes & Noble:

It’s a winter evening in Boston and the temperature has drastically dropped as a blizzard approaches the city. On this fateful night, Bernard Doyle plans to meet his two adopted sons, Tip the older, and more serious and Teddy, the affectionate dreamer, at a Harvard auditorium to hear a speech given by Jesse Jackson. Doyle, an Irish Catholic and former Boston mayor, has done his best to keep his two sons interested in politics, from the day he and his now deceased wife became their parents, through their childhoods, and now in their lives as college students. Though the two boys are African-American, the bonds of the family’s love have never been tested. But as the snow begins to fall, an accident triggers into motion a series of events that will forever change their lives.

The accident leaves Tip injured and an unknown women in critical condition. Shortly after the accident, they learn from the woman’s 11 year-old daughter, Kenya, that there is more to the story and that Kenya and her mother, have been keeping a secret for quite some time. This secret affects the Doyle’s in many ways and makes them question what’s important. As a result of the accident, they are all thrown together and forced to be around each other. This creates quite a bit of tension and awkwardness.

In my opinion, this is a story about family. It’s also a story about identity and acceptance. Tip and Teddy struggle with who they are and what they are expected to become. Doyle, their adopted father, wants the best for them but he wants very specific things. Teddy tries to do right by him in order to please him, but Tip wants to be his own person and refuses to give in to his father’s wants. Even Sullivan, Doyle’s biological son is at odds with who is is.

I have mixed feelings about this book. I enjoy character driven stories but I do not feel that these characters were fully developed and I was left wanting to know more about them. This was especially the case with the older brother, Sullivan. His is such a tragic story. When he was younger, he was involved in a car accident and his girlfriend was killed. Instead of offering support to his grieving son, Doyle convinces Sullivan to go along with the idea that the girlfriend was in fact behind the wheel, and not Sullivan. Being the Mayor at the time, Doyle felt compelled to protect his family in this way. However, that act ended up pushing his son away from him for good.

The relationship that Doyle has with all of his children is really quite sad. His expectations remain high and he never learns, even in crisis, the importance of self-worth. Yet even with all of his faults, you can sort of see why he wants each of his kids to live a certain way. I’m sure many parents want the best for their children but go about it the wrong way. That part is very realistic.

I should mention that much of this book is told within a 24 hour timeframe. This created a sense of “hurry” and gave it a claustrophobic feeling at times which further emphasized the frustration and angst between all of the characters. Although I felt the story could have gone a different way, overall I enjoyed the characters and would definitely read another book by Patchett. I just wish that some of the characters came away with more than what they started with.

Book Club Girl recently hosted a radio show with Ann Patchett. It’s a great interview and hearing what she had to say helped me understand the story a bit more. To check out the radio show, click here.


The Necklace: Thirteen Women and the Experiment That Transformed Their Lives, by Cheryl Jarvis

I received a copy of The Necklace: Thirteen Women and the Experiment That Changed Their Lives, by Cheryl Jarvis from Jen over at Devourer of Books. Thanks Jen!

First, a bit about the experiment:

A woman walks into a jewelry store and sees a beautiful diamond necklace. She tries it on and it occurs to her that she will never, in her lifetime, be able to afford something so beautiful. After thinking more about it, and seeing that the necklace goes on sale a few months later, she decides to get a group of women together so they can purchase the necklace as a group with the hopes of sharing it.

When I first heard about this book from Jen, I was intrigued with the idea. It is an interesting idea, but I was immediately skeptical. The cost of the necklace was not so much a concern to me, but the idea of thirteen women sharing the necklace?? That seemed like an impossible feat. Something about women in a group suddenly turns them into something they are not. These are my observations of course. I realize that there are exceptions.

Each chapter profiles one of the women and includes brief background information, how she came to be a part of the group, and what her feelings were at the time. There is a great deal of time spent on what they look like, etc. I found this to be incredibly distracting.

When Jonell McLain, the visionary behind the experiment, set out to start this group, I feel that she had expectations as to what she wanted for the group but that’s not what I feel was documented by Jarvis. We follow each woman as she takes her turn with the necklace and much of what is said it so trivial.

Each month they meet to discuss where Jewelia (the necklace) has been and to decide on how the necklace should be used, but whenever they get together, nothing is ever accomplished. There is a lot of bickering or a lot of silence and sometimes a combination of both. There is no real interaction between any of the women. I expected conflict but with conflict you expect to see growth. I did not see that here.

I think part of the reason these women feel so cold to me has to do with the way the chapters are structured. With each chapter dedicated to one of the women, we see very little of the interaction that had to have taken place at some point. Did these women ever go out with one another outside of the group? Was their relationship always centered around the necklace?

With the exception of one woman, I just didn’t see any life altering moments and in the end, we don’t even get to hear what Jonell thought of the experiment really. That too is trivialized. I think this story would be a good one for Oprah to pick up and discuss on her show. I need to see these women interact with one another in real life as paper did not do them justice, and I like to think that there is more to these women than just good hair and nice clothing.

Overall, I was not impressed. Have you read it? What did you think?